1. High demand doesn't just create value – it shifts how customers experience the journey.
2. When customers compete, the outcome may be uncertain, but the experience is always attributed to the brand.
3. Designing for disappointment means recognising these moments and responding to them intentionally.
1. High demand doesn't just create value – it shifts how customers experience the journey.
2. When customers compete, the outcome may be uncertain, but the experience is always attributed to the brand.
3. Designing for disappointment means recognising these moments and responding to them intentionally.
_11zon.jpg)
High demand is often seen as a success signal. It creates urgency, drives engagement, and reinforces value. But it also creates a different customer reality: not everyone will get what they came for.
When that happens, the transaction may be over – but the experience isn’t. And how brands handle that moment can define how they are remembered by customers.
Most customer journeys are designed for considered decision-making – where people can explore options, compare, and choose what best fits their needs. High-demand environments don’t work like that. When availability is limited and others are competing for the same outcome, behaviour changes:
If you’ve ever gone through the process of buying tickets online, you know it can be a layered, often frustrating experience: join the queue, wait your turn, watch the progress bar scoot slowly forward, finally get in only to be left with the unaffordable $1,000+ tickets.
In theory, you still have choice and control. In practice, it rarely feels that way.
You may have experienced a version of this elsewhere. Waiting in a long line at a restaurant. Trying to find affordable hotel bookings during peak season. Even trying to get on a full train. You’re technically moving forward in the journey, but the outcome is not the one you wanted.
In these moments, customers are not just navigating a journey – they are competing within it. This creates a very different experience to the one most customers journeys are designed for.
The pressure in these moments isn’t created by the brand alone. It’s shaped by the presence and behaviour of other customers – their speed, success, and ability to secure what’s limited.
But while the pressure is collective, the experience is personal.
Customers may be competing with each other, but they experience the outcome as a reflection of the brand. Whether the process felt clear or chaotic, fair or frustrating, is ultimately attributed to the organisation behind it.
Not everyone will get what they want. But the people who miss out still have a customer experience. They’ve invested time, attention, and effort. Often, they’ve invested emotional energy in a specific outcome.
And in many cases, the moment of disappointment becomes the most memorable part of the journey. If that moment feels unclear, unfair, or abrupt, it can outweigh everything that came before it.
This is where the opportunity sits for brands. Designing for disappointment isn’t about removing scarcity or reducing demand. It’s about recognising what those conditions create for customers – and responding to them intentionally.
That means designing not just for the people who succeed, but for the many who won’t.
In high-demand environments, uncertainty amplifies frustration. Helping customers understand what they’re entering into, before they invest time, can reduce the gap between expectation and reality.
This might include signalling demand levels, showing limited availability, or being upfront about the likelihood of missing out – before customers commit time to the process.
When customers are competing, perceived fairness becomes critical. Even when outcomes are limited, a process that feels transparent and consistent is more likely to be accepted.
This means making systems visible – not hidden.
When the desired outcome is no longer possible, the experience shouldn’t simply collapse. Customers need a clear, honest explanation of what’s happened. Without it, the moment can feel abrupt or even deceptive.
Even when customers miss out, they are still engaged. Providing a next step helps redirect that energy, rather than ending the experience in frustration. This could include waitlists, alerts, or surfacing alternative options.
Customers don’t just lose access – they lose the outcome they had in mind. Recognising the time, attention, and effort they’ve invested can shift how the experience is remembered. Even small signals of acknowledgement can make a difference.
If scarcity is part of the strategy, then disappointment is part of the experience. Designing for the moments where people miss out matters.
At The Research Agency, we help brands understand how experiences are actually felt – and where they break down under pressure.
Explore the fundamentals of customer experience in our Uncommon Series, or get insights like this in your inbox each month by signing up to FRAME via the form below.